Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2017
Mazda 3
2019 -
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP120 HP
Torque: 250 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds11.3 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.1
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
750 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.46 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
680 litres1019 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 339 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`875no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
Audi A3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 3, so Audi A3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): no data21 200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv