Audi A3 2016 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2018
Alfa Romeo 145
1999 - 2000
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP105 HP
Torque: 250 NM255 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds10.4 seconds
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 engine produces 5 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 145, but torque is 5 NM less than Alfa Romeo 145. Despite the higher power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.7
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres61 litres
870 km with real consumption1050 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.06 m
Width: 1.79 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Audi A3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Audi A3 is 36 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 145, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1130 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo 145, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9251`730
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

low
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 145 has
  • more dynamic
  • hydraulic power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv