Audi A3 2016 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 255 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 engine produces 5 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 145, but torque is 5 NM less than Alfa Romeo 145. Despite the higher power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 61 litres | |
870 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.06 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
Audi A3 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi A3 is 36 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 145, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1130 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo 145, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`730 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |