Audi A3 2016 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A3 engine produces 45 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Alfa Romeo 145. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 61 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi A3 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi A3 is 36 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 145, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
680 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo 145, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |