Audi A3 2016 vs Audi TT 2018

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2018
Audi TT
2018 - 2023
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Audi A3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi TT) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 150 HP197 HP
Torque: 340 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds6.9 seconds
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 engine produces 47 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 20 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway960 km on highway
800 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.19 m
Width: 1.79 m1.83 m
Height: 1.41 m1.36 m
Audi A3 is 23 cm longer than the Audi TT, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
680 litresno data
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A3 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10.9 metersno data
Gross weight: 1`980 kg1`715 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv