Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2018
Mazda 3
2019 -
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP116 HP
Torque: 380 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 seconds12.1 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 68 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data4.7
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
750 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.46 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
845 litres1019 litres
Audi A3 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 174 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0951`919
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data21 200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv