Audi A3 2016 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1999

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2018
Alfa Romeo 145
1999 - 2000
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 190 HP155 HP
Torque: 320 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds8.3 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 35 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Alfa Romeo 145. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data8.7
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres61 litres

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km290'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi Q3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo Spider
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.06 m
Width: 1.79 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Audi A3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Audi A3 is 36 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 145, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
680 litres1130 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 145.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9301`765
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

low
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 145 has
  • timing belt engine
  • hydraulic power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv