Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Audi A3 torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 3. Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
800 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 419 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
880 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`910 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | low | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |