Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2018
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP120 HP
Torque: 320 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds8.8 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 70 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.1
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
620 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
880 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`840 kg1`815 kg
Net weight:1`290 kg1`205 kg
Load capacity:550 kg610 kg
Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

low
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 15 80011 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv