Audi A3 2018 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Audi A3
2018 - 2020
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 seconds8 seconds
Audi A3 and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Audi A3 torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 3. Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data3.9
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
720 km with real consumption870 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres419 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`900 kg1`910 kg
Net weight:1`375 kg1`320 kg
Load capacity:525 kg590 kg
Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

low
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 15 80011 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv