Audi A3 2016 vs Kia Ceed 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Diesel (Audi A3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Kia Ceed) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Audi A3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 90 NM more than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Kia Ceed 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.31 m | 4.31 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
Audi A3 is larger, but lower. Audi A3 and Kia Ceed are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1220 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`181 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 15 600 | 14 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |