Audi A3 2014 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Audi A3
2014 - 2016
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP120 HP
Torque: 250 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds11.7 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
720 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.47 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
678 litres1263 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Audi A3 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 585 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`880no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): no data7800
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv