Audi A3 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Audi A3
2015 - 2016
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 172 HP104 HP
Torque: 271 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds13 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 68 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 127 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.9
Audi A3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.47 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
678 litres1263 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Audi A3 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 585 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): no data7600
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv