Audi A3 2014 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Audi A3
2014 - 2016
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds8.1 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Audi A3 torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 3. Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1240 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway1410 km on highway
880 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.47 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
678 litres1263 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Audi A3 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 585 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0401`910
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): no data7800
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv