Audi A3 2009 vs Opel Astra 2010

 
Audi A3
2009 - 2012
Opel Astra
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.7 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP110 HP
Torque: 230 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds12.6 seconds
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving.
Audi A3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
980 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 110 mm (4.3 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Astra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Astra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years2 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Skoda RoomsterUsed also on Opel Zafira
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Audi A3 2009 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ...  More about Audi A3 2009 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.29 m4.42 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.42 m1.51 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 13 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1104 litres1235 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Audi A3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8802`065
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 62003600
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Opel Astra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv