Audi A3 2009 vs Audi A3 2004

 
Audi A3
2009 - 2013
Audi A3
2004 - 2008
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP105 HP
Torque: 250 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds11.7 seconds
Audi A3 2009 and Audi A3 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi A3 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Audi A3 2009 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Audi A3 2009 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 2009 could require 45 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A3 2009 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3 2004.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1010 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.29 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 2009 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A3 2004, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
674 litres1120 litres
Audi A3 2004 has more luggage space.
Audi A3 2009 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3 2004. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 2004 (by 446 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9301`895
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 62003200
Pros and Cons:
    Audi A3 has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv