Audi A3 2020 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Audi A3 and Volkswagen T-Roc have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Audi A3 2020 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Audi A3 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.57 m | |
| Audi A3 is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1290 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Audi A3 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Audi A3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |