Audi A3 2020 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Audi A3 and Volkswagen T-Roc have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi A3 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A3 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Audi A3 2020 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Audi A3 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.57 m | |
| Audi A3 is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1290 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Audi A3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`835 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`285 kg | 1`272 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 578 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |