Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP120 HP
Torque: 320 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 seconds10.3 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 70 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.65.6
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1060 km on highway
650 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
845 litresno data
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9401`835
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

low
Audi A3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 17 00013 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv