Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

	Audi A3 2016 - 2020	Mazda 3 2016 - 2019
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	190 HP	120 HP
Torque:	320 NM	210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.8 seconds	10.3 seconds
	Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A3 engine produces 70 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	no data	5.6
Fuel tank capacity:	55 litres	51 litres
	650 km with real consumption	720 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.46 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.80 m	1.78 m
Height:	1.42 m	1.45 m
	Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	425 litres	419 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	880 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	11 meters	10.6 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight:	1`870 kg	1`835 kg
Net weight:	1`320 kg	1`240 kg
Load capacity:	550 kg	595 kg

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	high	low
	Audi A3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Audi A3, so Audi A3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€):	15 800	11 000
Pros and Cons:	Audi A3 has more power more dynamic fewer faults	Mazda 3 has lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions