Audi A3 2016 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | n/a NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Audi A3 and Fiat Bravo have the same engine power. Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.5 | |
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A3 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
Audi A3 is larger, but lower. Audi A3 is 12 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
880 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |