Audi A3 2020 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Audi A3
2020 -
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP116 HP
Torque: 360 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds12.1 seconds
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A3 engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.94.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.5 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1280 km in combined cycle1080 km in combined cycle
1350 km on highway1180 km on highway
900 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.46 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litres1019 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 181 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`919
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 21 60021 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv