Audi A3 2020 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A3 engine produces 1 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Audi A3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi A3 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A3 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2020 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi A3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi A3 is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1200 litres | 1191 litres | |
|
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`905 kg | 1`883 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`345 kg | 1`241 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 642 kg | |
| Audi A3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |