Audi A3 2020 vs Skoda Scala 2019

 
Audi A3
2020 -
Skoda Scala
2019 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP115 HP
Torque: 300 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds10.1 seconds
Audi A3 engine produces 1 HP more power than Skoda Scala, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Scala.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.64.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km5.1 l/100km
The Skoda Scala is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A3 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1380 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1380 km on highway
830 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.36 m
Width: 1.82 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Scala, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres467 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litresno data
Skoda Scala has more luggage space.
Audi A3 has 87 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Scala.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Scala.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9051`760
Safety:
Skoda Scala scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 60017 400
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Skoda Scala has
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv