Audi A3 2020 vs Skoda Scala 2019
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Audi A3 engine produces 1 HP more power than Skoda Scala, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Scala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
The Skoda Scala is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi A3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that by driving the Audi A3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A3 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
1470 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Scala, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 467 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
Skoda Scala has more luggage space. Audi A3 has 87 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Scala. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Scala. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`905 | 1`760 | |
Safety: | |||
Skoda Scala scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 400 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |