Audi A3 2013 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen EOS can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 184 HP | 122 - 210 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 380 NM | 200 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.4 seconds | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.6 | 4.8 - 7.5 | |
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. On average, Audi A3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 and Volkswagen EOS are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 205 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
678 litres | 380 litres | |
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity. Audi A3 has 115 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 298 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`936 | ~ 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
| |