Audi A3 2013 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2013 - 2016
Volkswagen EOS
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen EOS can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 110 - 184 HP122 - 210 HP
Torque: 200 - 380 NM200 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 11.4 seconds7.8 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.9 - 6.64.8 - 7.5
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. On average, Audi A3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.42 m
Width: 1.79 m1.79 m
Height: 1.41 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 and Volkswagen EOS are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
678 litres380 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A3 has 115 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 298 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`936~ 1`978
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): no data6400
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv