Audi A3 2008 vs Volvo V40 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.2 - 3.21.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 250 HP115 - 254 HP
Torque: 148 - 350 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 13.3 seconds6.3 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 9.43.2 - 9.0
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Audi A3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 110 mm (4.3 inches)133 mm (5.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V40 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.29 m4.37 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1120 litresno data
Audi A3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Audi A3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`916~ 1`976
Safety:
Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 64009000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv