Audi A3 2000 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Corolla can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 180 HP | 90 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 - 310 NM | 130 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 12.7 seconds | 8.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.3 | 5.6 - 8.3 | |
|
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Audi A3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
| Audi A3 is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1120 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`766 | ~ 1`243 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |