Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 190 HP | 116 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 380 NM | 150 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.4 seconds | 9.3 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.1 - 8.3 | |
|
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 569 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
845 litres | 1019 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Audi A3 has 249 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 174 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`937 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |