Audi A3 2020 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Audi A3 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 190 HP | 110 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 360 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 10.6 seconds | 4.9 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen T-Roc. On average, a Audi A3 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen T-Roc. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.57 m | |
| Audi A3 is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1290 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Audi A3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`886 kg | ~ 1`945 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`335 kg | ~ 1`402 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 551 kg | ~ 543 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |