Audi A3 2020 vs Mazda 3 2019

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2020 -
Mazda 3
2019 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Audi A3 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 3 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Audi A3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 150 HP116 - 186 HP
Torque: 250 - 360 NM150 - 270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.3 - 12.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.9 - 5.04.1 - 8.3
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Audi A3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.46 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres569 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1019 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Audi A3 has 144 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Audi A3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`892~ 1`900
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 28 20021 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • manual gearbox only
  • lower fuel consumption
Mazda 3 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv