Audi A3 2020 vs Mazda 3 2019

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2020 - 2024
Mazda 3
2019 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Audi A3 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types.

Performance

Power: 110 - 190 HP116 - 250 HP
Torque: 200 - 360 NM150 - 434 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 10.6 seconds8.1 - 12.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 7.44.1 - 9.0
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Audi A3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.46 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres569 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1026 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Audi A3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight: ~ 1`886 kg~ 1`914 kg
Net weight:~ 1`335 kg~ 1`400 kg
Load capacity:~ 551 kg~ 514 kg
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 29 80021 200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Mazda 3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv