Audi A3 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.5 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 110 - 190 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 200 - 380 NM220 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 10.7 seconds5.9 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 5.63.7 - 9.9
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.63 m
Width: 1.80 m1.87 m
Height: 1.42 m1.48 m
Audi A3 is smaller.
Audi A3 is 17 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
880 litres1749 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 869 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`842~ 2`087
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 17 00011 800
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volvo S60 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv