Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 190 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 380 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 10.7 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 5.6 | 3.8 - 8.1 | |
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 419 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
880 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`842 | ~ 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |