Audi A3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 110 - 190 HP100 - 184 HP
Torque: 200 - 380 NM144 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 10.7 seconds8 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 5.63.8 - 8.1
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Audi A3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi A3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
880 litresno data
Even though the car is shorter, Audi A3 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`842~ 1`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 17 00013 000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv