Audi A3 2016 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Alfa Romeo Giulia can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.1 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 190 HP | 150 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 380 NM | 380 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 10.7 seconds | 3.9 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 5.6 | 4.2 - 8.5 | |
|
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo Giulia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Audi A3 is smaller. Audi A3 is 18 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi A3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`842 | ~ 1`444 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A3 has
|
| |