Audi A3 2016 vs Audi A3 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Audi A3
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)1.4 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 110 - 190 HP102 - 250 HP
Torque: 200 - 380 NM148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 10.7 seconds6.3 - 13.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 5.75.1 - 10.6
Audi A3 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3 2004.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.31 m4.29 m
Width: 1.79 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi A3 2016 is 2 cm longer than the Audi A3 2004, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 2016 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1220 litres1120 litres
Audi A3 2016 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3 2004. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 2016 (by 100 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 2016 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi A3 2004.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`852~ 1`944
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 17 0003200
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Audi A3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv