Audi A3 2016 vs Audi A3 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Audi A3
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 110 - 190 HP90 - 180 HP
Torque: 200 - 380 NM145 - 235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 10.7 seconds7.5 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 5.74.9 - 8.9
Audi A3 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3 1996.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.31 m4.15 m
Width: 1.79 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Audi A3 2016 is larger.
Audi A3 2016 is 16 cm longer than the Audi A3 1996, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi A3 2016 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1220 litres1110 litres
Audi A3 2016 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A3 2016 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3 1996. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 2016 (by 110 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 2016 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3 1996.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`852~ 1`690
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 17 0001000
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Audi A3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv