Audi A3 2016 vs Skoda Rapid 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi A3
2016 - 2020
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Audi A3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Rapid can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 110 - 190 HP90 - 125 HP
Torque: 200 - 380 NM160 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 10.7 seconds8.9 - 11.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 5.74.0 - 4.8
Audi A3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.31 m4.30 m
Width: 1.79 m1.71 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
Audi A3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Audi A3 and Skoda Rapid are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres415 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1220 litresno data
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space.
Audi A3 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`852~ 1`684
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 17 0007800
Pros and Cons: Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • fewer faults
Skoda Rapid has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv