Audi 80 1988 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Audi 80
1988 - 1991
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 113 HP150 HP
Torque: 170 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds9.9 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 37 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.58.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway920 km on highway
800 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres440 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 45 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5401`865
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 16002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv