Audi 80 1989 vs Volvo S40 2002

 
Audi 80
1989 - 1991
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP122 HP
Torque: 142 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.7
Audi 80 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway920 km on highway
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi CoupeUsed also on Volvo V40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 80 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi 80 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data853 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv