Audi 80 1989 vs Opel Omega 1989

 
Audi 80
1989 - 1991
Opel Omega
1989 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP115 HP
Torque: 142 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds11.5 seconds
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 25 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.8
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi 80 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi CoupeInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Frontera, Opel Calibra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Omega might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.74 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 35 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres520 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
Audi 80 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`480no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 16003000
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv