Audi 80 1986 vs Volvo S40 2002

	Audi 80 1986 - 1989	Volvo S40 2002 - 2004
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	1.8 Petrol	1.8 Petrol
Performance
Power:	75 HP	122 HP
Torque:	140 NM	170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	13.6 seconds	10 seconds
	Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	7.7	7.7
Fuel tank capacity:	68 litres	60 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	880 km in combined cycle	770 km in combined cycle
	860 km with real consumption	710 km with real consumption
	Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.39 m	4.48 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.72 m
Height:	1.40 m	1.41 m
	Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	485 litres	471 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	853 litres
	Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter:	10.3 meters	11 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	1`490	1`750

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	average
Average price (€):	1000	1400
Rating in user reviews:	7.3/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:	Audi 80 has more full fuel tank mileage better manoeuvrability lower price	Volvo S40 has more power more dynamic higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi 80 1986 vs Volvo S40 2002

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions