Audi 80 1986 vs Audi 100 1988

	Audi 80 1986 - 1989	Audi 100 1988 - 1989
Gearbox:	Automatic	Manual
Engine:	1.6 Diesel	2.0 Diesel
Performance
Power:	54 HP	69 HP
Torque:	100 NM	123 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	n/a seconds	18.6 seconds
	Audi 80 engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Audi 100.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	7.2	6.7
	The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	68 litres	80 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	940 km in combined cycle	1190 km in combined cycle
	Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.39 m	4.79 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.81 m
Height:	1.40 m	1.42 m
	Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 40 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	485 litres	570 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	610 litres
	Audi 100 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100.
Turning diameter:	10.3 meters	11.6 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	1`510	1`800

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	1200	1200
Rating in user reviews:	7.3/10	8.4/10
Pros and Cons:	Audi 80 has better manoeuvrability lower price	Audi 100 has more power lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage roomier boot higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi 80 1986 vs Audi 100 1988

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions