Audi 80 1986 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Audi 80
1986 - 1989
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 54 HP136 HP
Torque: 100 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 22 seconds9.9 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 82 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 180 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 12.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.7
Audi 80 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1170 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 485 litres440 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 45 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5101`875
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 16002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv