Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo S60 2003

	Audi 80 1991 - 1995	Volvo S60 2003 - 2004
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.8 Petrol	2.5 Petrol
Performance
Power:	174 HP	210 HP
Torque:	250 NM	320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	9.6 seconds	7.4 seconds
	Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 36 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.9	9.9
Fuel tank capacity:	66 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	660 km in combined cycle	700 km in combined cycle
	880 km on highway	940 km on highway
	Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.48 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.41 m	1.43 m
	Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	430 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	710 litres	1034 litres
Turning diameter:	11.2 meters	12 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight:	1`810 kg	2`030 kg

Safety:	no data
Quality:	below average	above average
	Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€):	1000	1400
Rating in user reviews:	7.5/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:	Audi 80 has better manoeuvrability lower price	Volvo S60 has more power more dynamic more full fuel tank mileage fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo S60 2003

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions