Audi 80 1992 vs BMW 3 series 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 20 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Audi 80 has 4x4: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 5 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
| Audi 80 has 5 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |