Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 117 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
9.5
10.0
Real fuel consumption:
10.4 l/100km
10.6 l/100km
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity:
66 litres
70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
690 km in combined cycle
700 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption
660 km with real consumption
Dimensions
Length:
4.48 m
4.58 m
Width:
1.70 m
1.80 m
Height:
1.41 m
1.43 m
Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:
430 litres
424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
710 litres
1034 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 324 litres).
Turning diameter:
11.2 meters
12 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi 80 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
