Audi 80 1991 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 31 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda Xedos 6. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.1 | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi 80 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 9 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.36 m | |
| Audi 80 is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Audi 80 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. The Mazda Xedos 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda Xedos 6, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |