Audi 80 1991 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100 | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 80 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Audi 80 is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi 80 is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 452 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Audi 80 has 22 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |