Audi 80 1991 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is more dynamic to drive. Audi 80 engine produces 26 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Vento is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi 80 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Vento might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi 80 is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Vento, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Vento, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Volkswagen Vento has
| |