Audi 80 1991 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 104 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi 80 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi 80 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
710 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Audi 80 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Sierra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi 80 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |