Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo S60 2003

	Audi 80 1991 - 1995	Volvo S60 2003 - 2004
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	90 HP	180 HP
Torque:	148 NM	240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	13.6 seconds	8.8 seconds
	Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Audi 80 engine produces 90 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.7	9.2
Real fuel consumption:	8.6 l/100km	11.0 l/100km
	The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi 80 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi 80 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity:	66 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	750 km in combined cycle	760 km in combined cycle
	970 km on highway	980 km on highway
	760 km with real consumption	630 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.48 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.41 m	1.43 m
	Audi 80 is smaller. Audi 80 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	430 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	710 litres	1034 litres
Turning diameter:	11.2 meters	11 meters
	The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight:	1`650 kg	2`010 kg
Net weight:	1`190 kg	1`533 kg
Load capacity:	460 kg	477 kg

Safety:	no data
Quality:	below average	above average
	Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€):	1000	1400
Rating in user reviews:	7.5/10	8.0/10
Pros and Cons:	Audi 80 has lower fuel consumption lower price	Volvo S60 has more power more dynamic fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo S60 2003

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions