Audi 80 1991 vs Volvo S60 2002

 
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP130 HP
Torque: 202 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Audi 80 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Audi 80 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.36.5
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi 80 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Audi 80 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1240 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat AlhambraUsed also on Volvo S80
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi 80 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.58 m
Width: 1.70 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Audi 80 is smaller.
Audi 80 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi 80 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
710 litres1034 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Audi 80 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 324 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi 80 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7302`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv